| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Macro arguments get tampered with every time a new call has to be
bundled. Deep down this is done by cloning the underlying object, but
this resets any increase on the 'accessed' member, giving always the
impression that macro arguments are never accessed. Fix this by at least
preserving this member when cloning a macro argument.
Note that this is neither the most elegant solution, and probably not
the most correct. As in, it will probably get into a non-precise count
after some calls. But at least it will be a non-zero value, which is
more than enough to what this is actually used for.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When warning users on unused objects (e.g. variables, proc's), we have
to pick up the source of origin for this warning. In places where the
original PNode is not available, then we go with the last source we have
at hand, as that's the usual way to go (i.e. the error occurred at the
current source/context).
That being said, for unused objects that's not desirable, because we
might otherwise claim the error to happen on the file we first
targetted, but it's way more useful to understand where the object was
defined.
Hence, when defining a variable, address or proc, let's actually store
the PNode associated with it as well. This way the checker can hopefully
get the source from this PNode and be more clear to the user.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We cannot safely detect all scenarios in which there is dead code, but
we can safely do it for .proc's. Even if they are not called directly,
they might be referenced via jump tables and shenanigans like that. Long
story short, if you are not referencing a .proc in any meaningful way,
then we have dead code.
A pattern could also be given in which a function that was too long has
been splitted into smaller functions which are not called
directly. This is, in my opinion, an anti-pattern (as we generally
expect an rts or a jmp from .proc's), and anyways can be avoided via the
use of __fallthrough__ if the programmer is really set to write this
kind of code.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes 4f1a9c660108 ("Add the .fallthrough control statement")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This statement allows programmers to reserve a memory range for the
stack. This is useful to reserve a memory region which is not attached
to any variable, and:
1. It is a way to safely reserve space on the $0100 page.
2. The --stats/--write-info flags will be able to add up the memory
space reserved for the stack.
3. Future tooling might be able to use this value as a way to detect
stack overflows.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bundle call arguments were fine most of the times, when arguments could
be processed as-is and there were no issues with arguments being
overwritten by successive calls.
This was not the case, though, whenever a given instruction was delayed
into a PendingNode status. In this case, the argument would get the
last value, and in some extreme cases that definition might not have
been there any more.
Prevent all of this by providing a list of PendingDefine's, which are a
way to re-create these call-only arguments as they were initially
found. These PendingDefine's are then created on "crunch" on each
PendingNode.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are usually capitalized, and thus they are not going to be
following the usual zp_/m_/wr_ pattern.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They should be expanded to a 16-bit address from the zero-page. The fact
that the assembler was complaining about it was simply erroneous.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were two bugs involved at the same time. First, for some reason,
the "matches" clause was negated, which defeats the purpose of the
check. This even resulted in a bad test run which was accepted because I
just did not caught it before.
Second, pure indirect addressing mode is only available for the "jmp"
instruction. Hence, there's no need for that "matches" at all, and even
less to filter that based on "jsr" which doesn't even implement this
addressing mode.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was already the case for plain addresses, but it was not being
considered in the case of an arithmetic operation.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the target and effective addresses into the message, so it's more
clear how different they are.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was apparently neglected and you were able to pick invalid
identifiers to identify procs, macros and scopes. Ensure this does not
happen again and provide tests for it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implementing it as a control statement has the bad thing that it's
impossible to be compatible with other assemblers such as ca65, as you
cannot create dummy control statements or something like that in
there. Instead of that, we define it with the special underscores which
are still valid for identifiers, and give a "compiler-specific thingie"
flair to it.
This also has the benefit that the parser can be a bit more strict.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is exclusive to 'nasm' and it allows the developer to explicitly
tell the assembler than a "fall through" condition is actually desired:
it's not a mistake.
This comes in two flavors. The first, without arguments, just makes this
explicit without much enforcement. The second allows you to pass an
argument which is the name of the function or label you are expecting to
fall through. The assembler will error out if the fall through address
is not the expected one, hence telling the programmer whenever the fall
through condition they thought in the past is no longer true (e.g. the
function has moved somewhere else in the code).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes performing some 'jmp'/'jsr' can be quite pointless, and the
programmer might not be fully aware of this because of the layout of the
code. Imagine:
.proc foo
;; code
jmp bar
.endproc
;; Documentation, comments, extra space, etc.
.proc bar
;; whatever
.endproc
The 'jmp' in the code above tries to perform a call stack optimization,
but it's actually not needed because the next instruction after 'jmp' is
the one inside of 'bar', but that's obfuscated because of the layout.
In these sort of cases (and also for 'jsr' and branches) warn the
programmer about it so it can remove that instruction.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way, if you define a constant like:
MY_BUFFER_LEN_IN_BYTES = $10
You can then declare your buffer like so:
zp_buffer = $00 ; asan:reserve MY_BUFFER_LEN_IN_BYTES
And then further in the code you can rely on just using the constant for
bound checking, and then the address sanitizer will check on bound
checks via static analysis as well.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The check was not being applied on certain conditions.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way instructions which might make use of bare memory numbers can
freely ignore the address sanitizer when it actually makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This check ensures that asan-friendly names actually match their
expected scope.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The address sanitizer is now able to detect whenever in an instruction a
memory access is done without using variables. This is now detected for
all instructions except for branching, which falls outside of this
scope.
Moreover, simple arithmetics is allowed and bounds are checked for
simple cases. That being said, more involved bound checks should be done
with other tools (e.g. emulators).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This provides a more up-to-date experience, while also allowing to test
more cases. Moreover, the latest flags from 'xa65' are being used.
All in all, both 'code.nes' and 'aoc2023.nes' appear to be working after
the latest fixes.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows users to define variables directly from the command line,
which is useful for testing purposes.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update the underlying code.nes test data so it uses a tighter
configuration for NROM which in turn frees nasm from complaining about
empty segments. This makes room to allo for -Werror so we catch warnings
that might appear in the future.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way I can simply compress all the examples to traverse with a
single file, and thus no longer polluting this repository from code from
other repositories.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This needed some heavy lifting when it comes to how files were located.
This means that statements like .include/.incbin now take into
consideration a new list made out of SourceInfo, which holds enough
information to translate from which file a node comes from. This has
also been added into errors, so they are more informative on what went
wrong.
In order to tests this, besides all the regular unit tests, a new e2e
test has been added.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Let's continue with the good ol' tradition of being terrible at naming
things.
I have also renamed another project which was referenced here, so update
all references as well.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I have also added an end-to-end test for it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
|
|
For now I have added the most simple example for an NES/Famicom game,
which I already had on a private repository (that I plan to open source
soonish).
Tests simply run `nasm` on known source files and compares the results
with an .nes ROM file that has the exact bytes that we expect.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
