| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Change .fallthrough to __fallthrough__ | Miquel Sabaté Solà | 2026-02-02 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Implementing it as a control statement has the bad thing that it's impossible to be compatible with other assemblers such as ca65, as you cannot create dummy control statements or something like that in there. Instead of that, we define it with the special underscores which are still valid for identifiers, and give a "compiler-specific thingie" flair to it. This also has the benefit that the parser can be a bit more strict. Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com> | ||||
| * | Add the .fallthrough control statement | Miquel Sabaté Solà | 2026-02-02 | 1 | -0/+23 |
| This is exclusive to 'nasm' and it allows the developer to explicitly tell the assembler than a "fall through" condition is actually desired: it's not a mistake. This comes in two flavors. The first, without arguments, just makes this explicit without much enforcement. The second allows you to pass an argument which is the name of the function or label you are expecting to fall through. The assembler will error out if the fall through address is not the expected one, hence telling the programmer whenever the fall through condition they thought in the past is no longer true (e.g. the function has moved somewhere else in the code). Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com> | |||||
 |
index : tools.nes | |
| Tools for NES/Famicom development. |
| aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |