| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of making up a list of characters that end an identifier, do the
other way around since it's far less cumbersome and it prevents from
silly bugs such as "var+1" being considered a single identifier.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They are just synonyms for ".if .defined" and ".if !.defined"
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow for expressions that evaluate to a boolean expression. This in
turn mean that the value is just set to 0 or 1 depending on the given
condition. As with other assemblers, only a value of 0 evaluates to 0,
and others go to 1. So, something like "1 && 2" evaluates to 1 even if
it doesn't make much sense at first glance (as an assembler we just
assume that the programmer knows what it's doing).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As with e27a1593c8d8 ("Allow semicolons inside of strings"), the parser
was too naive and regarded any '=' operator as part of an assignment,
despite that it could be art of string literal.
Luckily the fix was already done inside of the parsing of assignments,
we just needed to move it up.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The parser was too naive and assumed that a semicolon immediately
implied an inline comment, and that might not just be the case as it is
with string literals.
Hence, the end of each semantic line has to consider not only whether
there is an inline comment, but also if a string literal is being used
and whether it surrounds or not the given semicolon.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some control statements (e.g. '.incbin', '.asciiz') only require a
double-quoted string as an argument. In fact, for these functions
there's only one argument required, which is this string one. Given this
fact, the parsing on these functions don't have to go through
the (expensive) general argument parsing function, and they can simply
assume that a double-quoted string will be provided.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some operators like '<' and '<<' could be mistakingly be treated as the
other. Let's remove this ambiguity when checking for unary operators.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The other cases in which fetching an "identifier" is not needed were
starting to pile up. Hence, split them into separate functions and allow
'parse_expression' to be more simple.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this it was left to the `parse_identifier` to figure things out,
but this was prone to silly errors like "a: b", in which it would
mistake it as the start of a label. Instead of any of this, just consume
a string literal if it has been detected.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also remove some pending TODOs.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also documented the struct as it is exported.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They started with good intentions, but in the end they were all pretty
much alike. Hence, it makes sense to simplify everything and provide a
single struct.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This needed some heavy lifting when it comes to how files were located.
This means that statements like .include/.incbin now take into
consideration a new list made out of SourceInfo, which holds enough
information to translate from which file a node comes from. This has
also been added into errors, so they are more informative on what went
wrong.
In order to tests this, besides all the regular unit tests, a new e2e
test has been added.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In bad314e1cfbf ("Prevent numeric literals from having spaces") it was
added already the restriction on not having whitespace characters in
literal expressions. Here we go a step further and we more explicitely
limit which symbol combinations can go into a literal declaration (e.g.
"#$2" is valid but "##2" is not).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It has been found that having literals like "# 20" can potentially be
troublesome and even introduce crashes. Hence, as it's done in other
assemblers, disallow this kind of syntax.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a control statement which acts similarly as .proc/.macro/.scope,
in which an inner block is allocated for it. Hence, all the previous
work from 1f8a6becc7cd ("parser: Implement block bodies") and
ec8b709fa24c ("Implement block bodies inside of the assembler") make
this one out possible, as .repeat statements don't have an identifier
that can be used for hashing.
From the parser perspective this introduction raises two new things.
First of all this control statement also needed a differentiation
between the amount of required arguments, and the allowed ones, since
there is a second optional argument to it. And second, even the
identifier is not given, we have to generate one so to add a context for
it. This was at first not needed, but introducing .repeat-only variables
means that we have to have inner contexts which need to be named somehow
so we can retrieve the context later when picking up the value for them
again.
This last thing brought the need for a new dependency: rand. This is
used to generate a random string to identify the .repeat block.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The parsing of control statements have become more complex since the
introduction of block bodies in 1f8a6becc7cd ("parser: Implement block
bodies"); so it makes sense to move it into its own thing and keep
`parse_statement` more clear.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Following 1f8a6becc7cd ("parser: Implement block bodies"), the support
for the new way of managing block bodies have also been added into the
assembler.
There are still some things to iron out, but they will be fixed in later
commits.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are bodies which are the right node of some proc controls. This
way the parser comes back to sanity for statements like .macro and the
likes, and behaves more like a usual parser. This was not done in the
past because I thought things could have been simpler this way, but it
ended up making the assembler way more complicated that it needed to.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This includes support for both binary and unary operators. Not all of
them as listed by ca65 have been moved in. Let's do that whenever it
make sense on each case.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some expressions might be enclosed with parenthesis in order to avoid
ambiguations when evaluating them. Account for this on the parser when
parsing expressions. Note that this is strictly only on the
`parse_expression` function; statements or other top level constructs
cannot be enclosed inside of parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the given char literal was not an ASCII one, there was the chance for
the character iterator to mess things up. Hence, when checking the
closing single quote, it might encounter a None value.
This is simply mitigated my moving the check of ASCII alphanumeric
before checking for the closing quote.
Fixes: b1623996c76f ("Add support for character literals")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead, use a new enum type to identify the control statements that we
actually support. This way the assembler is more easily aware on the
control that it's dealing with, and can be more sure on certain aspects
of the implementation on control support.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As a way to firstly adapt on the latest changes from the parser since
184c39579227 ("Re-work the parser from scratch"), the assembler had to
leave out some features on 16114b2ca358 ("Adapt the assembler to the
changes on the parser"). This commit reintroduces support for settings
labels, variables and referencing them, while also providing a more
robust implementation at that.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As of 184c39579227 ("Re-work the parser from scratch") the parser has a
proper AST, and the assembler has to traverse it accordingly.
Moreover, the assembler has been stripped from a lot of unneeded memory
allocations and it's overall more keen on using mere references when
possible.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
|
|
The initial implementation was incredibly naive on how complex an
assembler can actually be. Because of this, it never bothered to define
and produce a proper AST, and hence it was overall extremely fragile on
(not so) corner cases.
This commit re-writes everything from scratch for the parser, and it
should really be the last fundamental change to the parser other than
minor additions/features here and there.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|