| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is exclusive to 'nasm' and it allows the developer to explicitly
tell the assembler than a "fall through" condition is actually desired:
it's not a mistake.
This comes in two flavors. The first, without arguments, just makes this
explicit without much enforcement. The second allows you to pass an
argument which is the name of the function or label you are expecting to
fall through. The assembler will error out if the fall through address
is not the expected one, hence telling the programmer whenever the fall
through condition they thought in the past is no longer true (e.g. the
function has moved somewhere else in the code).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes performing some 'jmp'/'jsr' can be quite pointless, and the
programmer might not be fully aware of this because of the layout of the
code. Imagine:
.proc foo
;; code
jmp bar
.endproc
;; Documentation, comments, extra space, etc.
.proc bar
;; whatever
.endproc
The 'jmp' in the code above tries to perform a call stack optimization,
but it's actually not needed because the next instruction after 'jmp' is
the one inside of 'bar', but that's obfuscated because of the layout.
In these sort of cases (and also for 'jsr' and branches) warn the
programmer about it so it can remove that instruction.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The way macro expansions work is that the evaluated bundles replace the
current node, but this throws away the context of the line, the source,
etc. from the original line of code.
Add a stack that is pushed/popped when expanding macros, and are then
cloned for each pending node and error. This way, errors have full
context of the original code and can display backtraces for macro
expansion.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was a condition race in which some conflicts would be caught but
sometimes wouldn't depending on how/when `memory.memory_ranges` was
being filled.
Instead of this, just fill this vector with otherwise valid
candidates (other checks like "is it used?" still apply in this
context), and then perform the conflict check upon the already filled
vector.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way, if you define a constant like:
MY_BUFFER_LEN_IN_BYTES = $10
You can then declare your buffer like so:
zp_buffer = $00 ; asan:reserve MY_BUFFER_LEN_IN_BYTES
And then further in the code you can rely on just using the constant for
bound checking, and then the address sanitizer will check on bound
checks via static analysis as well.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These addresses are merely references to real APU/PPU addresses which
can be used for ease of use.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When evaluating an arithmetic operation, check on whether it
theoretically spans more than one byte, and set it on the resulting
Bundle.size. It's up to the caller to decide on whether that makes sense
or not. This fixes situations in which:
sta $200 + 1
was marked as having 2 bytes for the size as only the "1" was being
considered for the size on this operation. This would then signal the
"sta" evaluation that it was zeropage instead of absolute addressing.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows for reserving memory regions which go outside of the page
boundary.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@mssola.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Negative variables make no sense when it comes to do stuff like:
variable = -1
lda variable
That being said, as an assembler you never know the hacks and nonsense
programmers are willing to endure. But we do know that if the address
sanitizer is enabled, since if it's an "asan-friendly", then an explicit
negative variable can be barred.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The check was not being applied on certain conditions.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way instructions which might make use of bare memory numbers can
freely ignore the address sanitizer when it actually makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This check ensures that asan-friendly names actually match their
expected scope.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The address sanitizer is now able to detect whenever in an instruction a
memory access is done without using variables. This is now detected for
all instructions except for branching, which falls outside of this
scope.
Moreover, simple arithmetics is allowed and bounds are checked for
simple cases. That being said, more involved bound checks should be done
with other tools (e.g. emulators).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the initial support for both directives for the address
sanitizer. Note that asan:weak has been moved into asan:ignore, which is
not exactly the same but for now it should suffice.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit introduces the ability to inspect the temptative header
before producing the actual output, and with that it checks whether the
Working RAM is being advertised or not. If it is not being advertised
but the assembler detected memory accesses to that region, then we are
in trouble and we should error out.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This means removing a lot of `pub` structs or enums, as well as adding
documentation on `pub` structs.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This option prints further information on how segments are laid out. In
particular, for now it prints the amount of space being filled for each
segment.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some control statements like .if/.ifdef/.ifndef this is only desired
when the condition is true; otherwise getting into the inner block
should be prevented.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows the `evaluate_variable` to pull from it in the crunching
stage so to evaluate the original node in cases like macro expansion,
where the connection between the macro argument and the original caller
might have been lost.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On an arithmetical/logical operation, the literal mode needed to be
reset before evaluating the left arm since the previous evaluation of
the node could have altered it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I got a report from libfuzz that some cryptic input could make the
assembler panic on shifts. It turns out that the check on whether the
operator was too big or not had to be explicitely casted to `usize` to
avoid signedness issues.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Iterating via `bytes()` on a file is inefficient as the default
implementation calls `read` on each byte, which can be costly on bytes
which are not in memory like files. This is extra important for
statements like `incbin` as included files can be rather big.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows users to define variables directly from the command line,
which is useful for testing purposes.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were certain situations in which syntax ambiguity could arise. For
example, the parser as it stood could treat a valid expression such as
'lda #$80 >> 2' in an unexpected 'lda #$(80 >> 2)'.
This is of course bad, and it came from the fact that literals don't
have enclosing characters, and white spaces are not enough to provide
disambiguation in some cases. Because of this fact, the parser now has a
"look ahead" capability similar to many other parsers, and it's applied
for now only to literals. This looking ahead actually honors
parenthesis, so these can be added if the programmer wants to
explicitely disambiguate an expression.
This involved quite the heavy lifting, and some functions like
'parse_expression_with_identifier' had to be removed with the rewrite.
This had the side effect of having (hopefully) more sane functions all
around, and the parser also has a better capability to differentiate
between regular Values and Calls.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of making up a list of characters that end an identifier, do the
other way around since it's far less cumbersome and it prevents from
silly bugs such as "var+1" being considered a single identifier.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As a remnant of old code, the 'parse_decimal' function was not allowing
for decimal values larger than 8-bits. This was not the case in other
areas such as 'parse_hexadecimal', and in the rest of the code we
already cover that immediates are not too big in instructions. Hence,
this restriction can be lift up and allow up to 16-bit decimal literals.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They are just synonyms for ".if .defined" and ".if !.defined"
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This can be combined with .if/.elsif statements just like any other
expression.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow for expressions that evaluate to a boolean expression. This in
turn mean that the value is just set to 0 or 1 depending on the given
condition. As with other assemblers, only a value of 0 evaluates to 0,
and others go to 1. So, something like "1 && 2" evaluates to 1 even if
it doesn't make much sense at first glance (as an assembler we just
assume that the programmer knows what it's doing).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similarly to other assemblers, this allows the programmer to write a
definite amount of bytes with the same values.
Compared to other assemblers there are two things to notice. First,
there is a limit to it (i.e. whatever can fit in 2 bytes). Second, if
the fill value is not provided, then it will default to the current
mapping's fill value, or just 0x00 if the current mapping doesn't define
one of its own.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update the underlying code.nes test data so it uses a tighter
configuration for NROM which in turn frees nasm from complaining about
empty segments. This makes room to allo for -Werror so we catch warnings
that might appear in the future.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also remove some pending TODOs.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When calling `force_context_switch` the stack was mindlessly pushing the
given name without taking into consideration how scopes are to be laid
out. This made some variables/addresses that were previously preserved
no longer reachable when crunching pending nodes.
This patch also makes `force_context_switch` reset the stack before
doing anything at all, which means that `force_context_pop` was no
longer relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is a really weird thing to do, but on a twisted way I can see how
someone could think of such a monstrosity. Panicking on such a case is
not valid because that's not the fault from the assembler but from the
programmer, and so a proper message should be displayed instead.
This was detected via the fuzzer, but it was a side effect from
e7c5e63d04f6 ("Evaluate bare numbers as decimal values").
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In places like macro calls, the programmer might actually prefer to pass
a numeric argument as is, without any prefixes. In these cases, just
evaluate it as a decimal. In fact, this was already covered when
evaluating the context because the same thing happens to assignments.
Hence, I just needed to expand the scope of this.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also documented the struct as it is exported.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They started with good intentions, but in the end they were all pretty
much alike. Hence, it makes sense to simplify everything and provide a
single struct.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This needed some heavy lifting when it comes to how files were located.
This means that statements like .include/.incbin now take into
consideration a new list made out of SourceInfo, which holds enough
information to translate from which file a node comes from. This has
also been added into errors, so they are more informative on what went
wrong.
In order to tests this, besides all the regular unit tests, a new e2e
test has been added.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes, out of clarity, the programmer may have written something
along the lines of:
lda $40, y
This is invalid because the `lda` instruction does not allow zeropage
y-indexing addressing mode. That being said, it does allow for absolute
y-indexing addressing mode. This commit allows this syntax by
transforming code like the previous one into:
lda $0040, y
This cannot always be done, but the assembler should at least try if
it's possible and not trouble the programmer.
That being said, this is otherwise a bit shady since the programmer
might think that it's a 2-byte instruction when it's a 3-byte one.
Hence, maybe a future linter can pick up code like this and suggest a
more explicit writing.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|