| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also remove some pending TODOs.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way I can simply compress all the examples to traverse with a
single file, and thus no longer polluting this repository from code from
other repositories.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When calling `force_context_switch` the stack was mindlessly pushing the
given name without taking into consideration how scopes are to be laid
out. This made some variables/addresses that were previously preserved
no longer reachable when crunching pending nodes.
This patch also makes `force_context_switch` reset the stack before
doing anything at all, which means that `force_context_pop` was no
longer relevant.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is a really weird thing to do, but on a twisted way I can see how
someone could think of such a monstrosity. Panicking on such a case is
not valid because that's not the fault from the assembler but from the
programmer, and so a proper message should be displayed instead.
This was detected via the fuzzer, but it was a side effect from
e7c5e63d04f6 ("Evaluate bare numbers as decimal values").
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In places like macro calls, the programmer might actually prefer to pass
a numeric argument as is, without any prefixes. In these cases, just
evaluate it as a decimal. In fact, this was already covered when
evaluating the context because the same thing happens to assignments.
Hence, I just needed to expand the scope of this.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also documented the struct as it is exported.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They started with good intentions, but in the end they were all pretty
much alike. Hence, it makes sense to simplify everything and provide a
single struct.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This needed some heavy lifting when it comes to how files were located.
This means that statements like .include/.incbin now take into
consideration a new list made out of SourceInfo, which holds enough
information to translate from which file a node comes from. This has
also been added into errors, so they are more informative on what went
wrong.
In order to tests this, besides all the regular unit tests, a new e2e
test has been added.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In bad314e1cfbf ("Prevent numeric literals from having spaces") it was
added already the restriction on not having whitespace characters in
literal expressions. Here we go a step further and we more explicitely
limit which symbol combinations can go into a literal declaration (e.g.
"#$2" is valid but "##2" is not).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It has been found that having literals like "# 20" can potentially be
troublesome and even introduce crashes. Hence, as it's done in other
assemblers, disallow this kind of syntax.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes, out of clarity, the programmer may have written something
along the lines of:
lda $40, y
This is invalid because the `lda` instruction does not allow zeropage
y-indexing addressing mode. That being said, it does allow for absolute
y-indexing addressing mode. This commit allows this syntax by
transforming code like the previous one into:
lda $0040, y
This cannot always be done, but the assembler should at least try if
it's possible and not trouble the programmer.
That being said, this is otherwise a bit shady since the programmer
might think that it's a 2-byte instruction when it's a 3-byte one.
Hence, maybe a future linter can pick up code like this and suggest a
more explicit writing.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a control statement which acts similarly as .proc/.macro/.scope,
in which an inner block is allocated for it. Hence, all the previous
work from 1f8a6becc7cd ("parser: Implement block bodies") and
ec8b709fa24c ("Implement block bodies inside of the assembler") make
this one out possible, as .repeat statements don't have an identifier
that can be used for hashing.
From the parser perspective this introduction raises two new things.
First of all this control statement also needed a differentiation
between the amount of required arguments, and the allowed ones, since
there is a second optional argument to it. And second, even the
identifier is not given, we have to generate one so to add a context for
it. This was at first not needed, but introducing .repeat-only variables
means that we have to have inner contexts which need to be named somehow
so we can retrieve the context later when picking up the value for them
again.
This last thing brought the need for a new dependency: rand. This is
used to generate a random string to identify the .repeat block.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is not safe to store a node index for macros since the list of nodes
that is passed down during assembly might change depending on whether an
inner block is being evaluated. Hence, the previous implementation would
break on a simple macro call inside of a .proc.
This also raised some concerns on the design around the API, since the
lifetime of references for internal assembler data needed an explicit
lifetime now, and as a side-effect functions like `assemble` had to be
moved out of the inner impl Assembler. This is in retrospect also a
better design choice.
Fixes: ec8b709fa24c ("Implement block bodies inside of the assembler").
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The parsing of control statements have become more complex since the
introduction of block bodies in 1f8a6becc7cd ("parser: Implement block
bodies"); so it makes sense to move it into its own thing and keep
`parse_statement` more clear.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Following 1f8a6becc7cd ("parser: Implement block bodies"), the support
for the new way of managing block bodies have also been added into the
assembler.
There are still some things to iron out, but they will be fixed in later
commits.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are bodies which are the right node of some proc controls. This
way the parser comes back to sanity for statements like .macro and the
likes, and behaves more like a usual parser. This was not done in the
past because I thought things could have been simpler this way, but it
ended up making the assembler way more complicated that it needed to.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Let's continue with the good ol' tradition of being terrible at naming
things.
I have also renamed another project which was referenced here, so update
all references as well.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of calling `evaluate_node` for each node on a macro, just call
`Assembler::bundle` for the list of nodes so the context is preserved
and labels and other statements can be catched as usual.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is just prone to errors and it is confusing all around. Just
prohibit developers doing that.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prevent a missmatch on .end{macro,proc,scope}. This was more or less
already covered when there was a bad context_pop call, but it was prone
to errors.
Check this in eval_context as it should've always been done.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Force .segment and .macro statements to be on the global scope since
this is how they are meant. Hence, if the programmer tries to do this,
just error out.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This opens up the door for developers to pass their own configuration
files.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will allow the creation of configuration files that can live
outside of this tree, so developers can fine tune configuration files of
their own without having to pick up whatever is currently available.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I have also added an end-to-end test for it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For now I have added the most simple example for an NES/Famicom game,
which I already had on a private repository (that I plan to open source
soonish).
Tests simply run `nasm` on known source files and compares the results
with an .nes ROM file that has the exact bytes that we expect.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: 8b5feeed96b3 ("assembler: Implement and add tests for operators")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This means that the source code under `crates/` is under the GNU
GPLv3 (or any later version), and that source code under `lib/` is under
the GNU LGPLv3 (or any later version).
In practice this relaxes a bit the previous licensing because before it
was all GNU GPLv3 (or any later version). For people compiling a binary
with these libraries then this would've been spilling over the GPLv3 on
their binaries as well, which might not be desired. Instead, for the
libraries abide by the LGPLv3 (or any later version), which has the same
guarantees when it comes to free/lliure software for this specific case,
but at least we don't force the GPLv3 (or any later version) onto users.
That being said, users of these libraries still need to provide object
files so third parties could theoretically recompile those binaries
under a modified library.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit ea5f0f81b8a7 ("Shrink some absolute instructions by one byte")
applied the optimization in all cases, but we cannot perform it on
bundles which are yet to be resolved. This is because in unresolved
bundles the value is only an offset, which usually will fit on a single
byte and hence the optimization would've been carried out. That being
said, whenever we resolve this it might just be the case the it wouldn't
have fit in that single byte, and hence we end up with an artificially
shrinked instruction for a 16-bit address.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some instructions which make use of absolute addressing can actually be
further compressed to act like zeropage indexing. This can be done if
the immediate being used by that instruction can actually fit into a
single byte. If that's the case, we will then "correct" the programmer
by using zeropage indexing instead of an absolute one, thus reducing one
byte for that instruction.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was weird to show warnings which also showed "Error: " as a message,
and likewise it was weird for errors to display their kind, since users
simply do not care about this kind of information.
Hence, streamline the format to something closer to what it's done by
modern assemblers/compilers.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Even if there are no errors, if warnings are to be treated as errors
then the output should behave the same as if they were errors. That is,
in case there are warnings and they are to be treated as errors, then do
not spit out any assembled bundle.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Warnings are mere xixanta::error::Error's which are not pushed into the
Err of Result. That is, instead they are accumulated into an internal
`warnings` vector inside of Assembler.
On the binary side we now show warnings as well, and there is an option
to turn warnings into errors.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is normal when calling the same macro multiple times and in which
parameter values need to be updated on each case.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a given variable cannot be found on the current scope, attempt to go
up the context hierarchy to find it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This includes support for both binary and unary operators. Not all of
them as listed by ca65 have been moved in. Let's do that whenever it
make sense on each case.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some expressions might be enclosed with parenthesis in order to avoid
ambiguations when evaluating them. Account for this on the parser when
parsing expressions. Note that this is strictly only on the
`parse_expression` function; statements or other top level constructs
cannot be enclosed inside of parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This also forced us to add the current working directory to the
`Assembler::assemble` public function, as otherwise this control
statement and others wouldn't know how to resolve relative paths.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The handling of labels and proc's both when evaluating the context and
when bundling is almost identical. The only change is that proc's need
to change the context afterwards, but otherwise they need to create a
label just as regular ones.
Merge things as much as possible on both these cases, while also taking
the chance to do some much needed clean up around these areas, and
adding a bit of helpful comments in between.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@gmail.com>
|